Comparison
东南亚新闻-通缉-曝光社🌏 vs 高速代理-飞机代理-免费代理-公益加速器-公益节点
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @dnyxinwen668 | @tgfjdl |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 16,405 | 11,875 |
| Avg views | 11,982 | 6,720 |
| Engagement rate | 73.0% | 56.6% |
| 30-day growth | — | — |
| Language | 中文 | 中文 |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 1458 days | 3133 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@dnyxinwen668
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@tgfjdl
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.