Comparison
Pavel Durov vs Leo - Match & Meet new friends
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @durov | @leomatchglobal |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 11.5M | 2.4M |
| Avg views | 6.8M | 8.8M |
| Engagement rate | 59.8% | 363.7% |
| 30-day growth | -23.6% | -0.2% |
| Language | English | English |
| Category | personal | — |
| Channel age | 3924 days | 1070 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@durov
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@leomatchglobal
Mixed signals
- Engagement swings sharply between snapshots — unstable reach
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.